May 2nd, 2010
Sportsmanship is important. I’ve blogged (briefly) before on ball-tampering in cricket and disrespect for sportspeople, as well as how competitors can inspire. Recently I was disappointed to read of how sportsmanship had become so underrated in schools. More so since sportsmanship was one of the principal reasons behind competitive sport being encouraged in my schooling.
I also love snooker: the skill, precision, temperament and strategic consideration necessary to excel in this game are all aspects I find appealing. So it is with consternation that I greet the news that John Higgins has been suspended in a snooker bribe probe. I have admired John Higgins as a player for many years, a great all-round match-player, in many respects an under-achiever. There are claims, it appears with evidence, he may have lost frames purposely for cash, given it is now possible to bet on a frame basis.
What is clear is this: even if he has never thrown a match, players have a responsibility to perform at their best, for the sake of spectators and for the future of the sport. Hence why Ronnie was once fined for prematurely conceding a frame. To think that even a single frame was given up when you believe you are sharing, even to a small degree, the thoughts and emotions of the players on the table, is terrible. I sincerely hope there is no foul play. If it is found that there was malpractice, I hope snooker – like so many other sports – will survive, albeit scarred.
Posted in General, Sport | No Comments »
November 23rd, 2009
A relative was recently granted an MBE (I have already written on the British Honours System) and my family and I had the pleasure of attending a party to celebrate their achievement. One striking, and refreshing, aspect of the party was the level of multiculturalism apparent in the guests invited. One of several conversations I remember from the night was with an aunt about the relative loss of Indian cultural values in her family, and how these might be infused into her teenage daughter’s upbringing. As a second generation Asian brought up in the UK, I have been through all this myself, and have also observed a wide “scale” of adherence to cultural or religious values in family and friends. Lifestyle choices such as drinking, smoking and eating meat must, I have come to realise, be treated as such. You don’t have to be cultural or religious to understand the danger in being addicted to any of these, and for this reason I personally believe there is more advantage to abstaining than indulging. Even the mother tongue, a few generations down the line, may unfortunately disappear from everyday conversation; I note here that fluency in an Asian language does not necessarily give one a better understanding of a culture, Bollywood being a case in point. From my own experiences, what I think matters most is understanding of one’s philosophical heritage, and the rationale behind certain actions or beliefs. The meaning behind specific rituals, why certain ways of living are prescribed in scriptures, tales demonstrating virtues to which one should aspire.
My discussion with this aunt spurred me to think about how second, or third, generation Hindus can access their rich background when this is not being achieved at home or in their schooling. I believe there are a few ways one can learn about such aspects of Hindu culture, and for many they may beneficially affect lifestyle choices, the way they perceive the world, and the decisions they make. Some may favour the scholastic route, reading books by revered pandits, learning about historical struggles of Hindu leaders, or studying the Vedas. Others, just as admirably, may follow a devotional path, following a guru and learning through their teachings, or focusing on a religious path which brings them peace. A third, more casual but equally valid, method is learning about the stories which underpin the cultural heritage of a nation. The Ramayana and Mahabharata, considered as scriptures, are also phenomenal, accessible stories. Popular video adaptations are available and cater for any audience, regardless of age. These are by no means mutually exclusive routes, but highlight the fact that different routes appeal to different types of people.
It is the third for which I showed my enthusiasm while I conversed with the aunt. The idea isn’t to “convert” anyone (in this case, even if they have the same background!), but to inspire some curiosity into one’s cultural and religious heritage. At worst, it will give access to intriguing, if not delightful, tales of battles between good and evil. In any case, it may help redress an imbalance by placing these epics in modern thought alongside western masterpieces such as the Odyssey, the Iliad and the Aeneid.
Posted in Culture, General, Perspective, Religion | No Comments »
October 24th, 2009
As a regular viewer of Question Time and someone who finds the BNP repulsive, I feel compelled to share my views on BNP leader Nick Griffin’s recent appearance on Question Time. The press, protesters and the BNP had a field day: angry scenes outside the BBC Television Centre, Griffin complaining about being victimised on the show, and sympathy from voters.
Several issues/arguments have been raised:
- Firstly, that the BBC should not have provided a platform for BNP. I dispute this. The BBC should be concerned with political impartiality as well as with representing the views of the British people. I find the BNP and its views deeply abhorrent, but I also believe that political censorship cannot be outsourced to the BBC. All organisations – public or otherwise – should have a responsibility not to incite violence, but given the BNP is currently a legitimate party with elected politicians, they should be treated as such.
- Secondly, that the BBC, having invited Nick Griffin, should not have victimised Nick Griffin. I don’t think that the show was any different in format to a typical Question Time show. The producers have some discretion: the composition of the panel and audience, and the questions chosen from the floor. On the show itself, however, just like any other Question Time, it is the audience that drives the discussion. Dimbleby has jurisdiction, but on the whole allows the discussion to take its course, with a bit of realignment now and then. Dimbleby tested Jack Straw on Labour’s immigration policies as much as Nick Griffin’s views on a British indigenous people. It’s unfortunate that there was disproportionate focus on the BNP, but that’s not the BBC’s fault. Setting strict time limits would stifle debates. If you don’t like the format, say so, don’t use it as ammunition to attack how the BBC handled Nick Griffin’s appearance on the show.
- Thirdly, that even though the BBC has a right to invite Nick Griffin to Question Time, it has had the disastrous effect of positive publicity for the BNP. I am stunned how Nick Griffin’s performance can garner sympathy for BNP’s cause. I sincerely hope the contributors on BBC’s Have Your Say board do not represent the public. Sure, the other panelists did not do a hugely better job, but they were convincing enough to denounce the BNP. It’s not a difficult job to do this. So, from what I have read, maybe BNP supporters have risen out of discontent or apathy for the major parties. How it has happened, I cannot understand, but it is sad.
Posted in General, Politics | No Comments »
July 6th, 2009
Sometimes I wonder about the different types of people that inspire. Some are not widely known, but to whom as a group so many are grateful for their freedom and very existence, such as brave soldiers or selfless charity workers. The influence of some others is highly localised and personal, but just as inspirational, such as teachers, mentors, or family members who have built so much from so little. A third category contains the heroes and heroines of history – contemporary and classical – the Gandhis and Wellingtons of the world. Today I am in awe of a fourth type of wonder. The genius. Men and women of character exist across many fields; sport, politics, academia, service. Genius, to me, engenders a natural talent. Here you have the Ramanujans and Ronnie O’Sullivans of the world. Today, of course, I am thinking of Roger Federer, who today expressed both his genius and immense character. His genius on court, combined with his humility in defeat or in victory, is something I find inspirational. Someone who achieves not to win titles or honours, fame or fortune, but to push the limits of human endeavour.
Posted in General, Perspective, Sport | Comments Off
August 7th, 2007
I loved the movie so much that I read the book. I enjoyed the book, but do not feel the story as a whole will rank in my mind as one of the most spectacular.
Instead, as I find is often the case, specific moments in the novel or the way a thought is portrayed, perhaps some witty remark in the narrative, subtle irony or dramatic speech, serve to make the rest of the book bearable. Maybe I’m strange in this way: I may only recall the gist of a tale but the emotions felt at particular moments are more easily revived.
For this reason, I made sure I noted statements I found striking while reading this book; to anyone else, they will likely be meaningless. My hope is to capture the book in a few excerpts that have affected me. So here are some memorable quotes from E. M. Forster’s A Passage to India.
“Aziz was exquisitely dressed, from tie-pin to spats, but he had forgotten his back-collar stud, and there you have the Indian all over; inattention to detail, the fundamental slackness that reveals the race.” Ch. 8
Her hand touched his, owing to a jolt, and one of the thrills so frequent in the animal kingdom passed between them, and announced that their difficulties were only a lovers’ quarrel. Ch. 8
Nothing enrages Anglo-India more than the lantern of reason if it is exhibited for one moment after its extinction is decreed. Ch. 17
“You remember the one I had a knock with on your maidan last month. Well, he was all right. Any native who plays polo is all right. What you’ve got to stamp on is these educated classes, and, mind, I do know what I’m talking about this time.” Ch. 20
“I am waiting for the verdict of the courts. If he is guilty I resign from my service, and leave India. I resign from the Club now.” Ch. 20
When that strange race nears the dust and is condemned as untouchable, then nature remembers the physical perfection that she accomplished elsewhere, and throws out a god — not many, but one here and there, to prove to society how little its categories impress her. Ch. 24
Ronny’s religion was of the sterilized Public School brand, which never goes bad, even in the tropics. Wherever he entered, mosque, cave or temple, he retained the spiritual outlook of the fifth form, and condemned as ‘weakening’ any attempt to understand them. Ch. 28
Posted in Culture, General, Reading, Religion | No Comments »